So-and-so suggested I read this passage.  Didn’t Pastor PHD do a sermon on that passage once?  Oh no, I can’t remember what (s)he said now.  I think it was really long though, so there must be a lot to go on in that passage.  But I don’t get it!  I mean, all it says is “Jesus wept.”  I don’t get it!    Why is this important?  Oh God, I’m such a failure I can’t read the bible on my own.

Do I exaggerate?

No much, because what happens is we put so much importance on the text that we become terrified to actually study it on our own.  Or when we do, we compare our efforts to the herculean eschatological exegesis of Dr. Whatshisface.  But if we remember that the bible is a collection of stories and essays then it suddenly becomes a bit easier.

If we take the passage “Jesus wept” from a literary point of view then we instantly have the questions we need to read and study it.

  • What made him weep?
  • Did Jesus normally weep, was he a crybaby?
  • What does this tell us about the Character of Jesus?
  • What was his response?
  • What does his response tell us about the Character of Jesus?”

In the same way, reading the epistles becomes like reading an essay.  We have certain questions we can ask ourselves as we read them to better understand and study them.

  • What is the essay’s thesis?
  • What are the principle arguments used to support the thesis?
  • Do the arguments succeed?”

Now I’m the first to admit that this is all pretty academic and a generally left brain method of reading the bible.  There are other practices such as Lectio Dvinia and visual interpretation that are better suited to creative types and I’ll probably talk about them more another day, but for right now, can I just remind everyone that the greatest story ever told is still a story.